HomeBlog › Why my videos are not bringing patients

Why are my videos not bringing in patients?

The short answer

Because almost all of it is made for people who are already looking for you. Out of any hundred people who could become your patients, roughly three are ready to book something today. The other ninety seven are at an earlier stage, and most clinic videos say nothing to them at all.

The fix is not more videos or better editing. It is deciding, before anything is filmed, which stage of awareness each video is for, and then building your subjects around those stages instead of around what you want to sell.

A doctor posts for six months. The views come. The comments come. The appointments do not. So he decides that video works for other people and not for medicine, and he stops.

That conclusion is almost always wrong, and the reason is not effort, budget or camera quality. It is that the videos were all made for the same small group of people, and it was the smallest group of all.

The hundred people, and where they actually are

Think about a hundred people in your city who could one day sit in your chair. They are not all in the same place. Some of them are searching for a doctor tonight. Some of them do not yet know that the thing they live with has a name.

This is an old idea and a well tested one. Eugene Schwartz set it out in Breakthrough Advertising in 1966 as five stages of awareness, from a person who has no idea anything is wrong to a person who already knows exactly what he wants to buy. Chet Holmes later put numbers beside it in The Ultimate Sales Machine, and his finding is the one worth holding on to: in any market, only about three people in a hundred are actively looking to buy right now.

Put it in a clinic's language and it looks like this. The exact split moves with the city, the treatment and the season, so treat the numbers as a working picture and not as a measurement of your own practice.

3of 100
Ready to book todayThey know the problem, they know a treatment exists, and they are choosing a doctor tonight.
17of 100
Gathering informationThey have decided to do something about it. They are reading, comparing and asking, and they have not picked anyone yet.
20of 100
They know something is wrongThey feel it. They have not been told it has a name, that it is treatable, or that your kind of medicine treats it.
60of 100
They do not know anything is wrongThe tiredness, the sleep, the skin, the cycle. They have decided it is normal, or their age, or stress, and they live with it.

Now go and look at your last ten videos. Almost every clinic account in India, when you do this honestly, finds the same thing: ten videos made for the three, and nothing made for the sixty.

What the three see

Book your consultation. We treat this condition. Our clinic, our team, our years of experience. Festival offer. Timings and address. This is all useful, and the three people who are already looking will use it.

What the sixty need, and almost never get

They need to hear their own symptom described out loud by somebody who knows what it is. Not a treatment. Not your clinic. Just the thing they feel, named accurately, by a doctor. The whole job of that video is to move a person from "this is normal" to "wait, that is me".

What the twenty need

They already know something is wrong. What they do not know is that it is treatable at all, or that it is treatable without the thing they are afraid of. That video is not about you either. It is about the fact that a path exists.

If nothing you post speaks to the ninety seven, you have not tested whether video works. You have tested whether three people out of a hundred were paying attention this month.

Why the pillars are usually wrong

A content pillar is just a subject you come back to again and again, so that over a year you are known for something instead of posting at random. Most clinics choose their pillars by looking at their own price list. Treatments become pillars. Departments become pillars. The newest machine becomes a pillar.

That is choosing by what you sell. It puts every subject in the same place on the ladder, at the end, where only the three are standing.

The alternative costs nothing to adopt. Every pillar is chosen for a stage first and a subject second. One pillar exists to name symptoms for people who think they are fine. One exists to show the people who know something is wrong that a path exists. One carries proof and comparison for the people already deciding. One, and only one, asks for the appointment.

The same doctor, the same camera, the same eight minutes of filming. A different decision made before the camera was switched on.

Reach is not the same as follower count

The common objection at this point is that a small account cannot reach the sixty, so there is no point trying until the following is bigger.

One of our own client's videos answers that. Shubhi Mittal had 84 followers. Her second video, made for people who had never heard of her, has been watched 251,000 times. You can open it and check it yourself, which is the only reason it is worth putting in writing.

Nothing about that number came from her following. It came from the video being built for people who did not know her yet. That is what these platforms push, and it is the one advantage a small clinic account genuinely has.

Then there is the second half, and it is the half that gets skipped

Suppose the videos are right and the sixty start watching. A person at eleven at night finally understands that the thing he has lived with has a name. What can he do about it at that moment?

On most clinic accounts the only answer is a phone number. A phone call is a big step for a person who has just worked out he has a problem. He is not ready to say it out loud to a stranger. So he watches, he feels something, and he goes to sleep. Nobody counts him, and nobody follows up, because nothing about him was ever recorded.

A page he can read on his own, at his own pace, without speaking to anyone, catches the people a phone number never will. For one Ayurvedic clinic we run this for, 437 people arrived on those pages between 11 August and 1 September 2026, and 219 of them paid, from his own live records. Nobody phoned any of them first.

You can see every step of how that was built, including the numbers and the screens.

How to check your own content in ten minutes

You do not need a tool or a meeting for this. Open your account, take the last ten videos, and write one of four words next to each: unaware, problem, solution or ready.

  • Unaware. The video names a symptom or a habit a person would not have connected to anything. It does not mention treatment or the clinic.
  • Problem. The person already knows something is wrong. The video tells him what it is called and that it can be treated.
  • Solution. The video compares approaches, answers a fear, or shows what the treatment actually involves.
  • Ready. The video asks for the appointment.

If eight or more of your ten land on ready, you now know exactly why the appointments are not moving, and you also know the cheapest thing you can change this week. It is not the camera.

One thing to be careful about before you publish

Content that names symptoms and explains treatments sits close to a line that is drawn tightly in India. What a doctor may say in public is governed by the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, which forbids advertising the cure of a long list of named conditions, and by the medical council’s own rules on soliciting patients. Educating people is not the same as advertising a cure, and the difference is mostly in the verbs you use.

We are writing that up properly as its own article, because it deserves more than a paragraph and because a wrong answer there is expensive.

Questions people ask about this

Why do my clinic videos get views but no appointments?

Views tell you a video was watched, not that it was watched by somebody ready to act. If the content only ever speaks to people who are already looking for a doctor, it reaches a very small group, roughly three people in a hundred. Content made for people at an earlier stage will bring lower intent but far more of them, and it builds the group that books later.

What is a content pillar?

A content pillar is a subject you return to regularly so that people come to know you for it. Three or four pillars is normal. The mistake is choosing pillars from your treatment list. Choose them so that each one speaks to a different stage of awareness, from people who do not know they have a problem to people ready to book.

How many videos does a clinic need before it works?

There is no honest fixed number, and anyone who gives you one is guessing. What matters more is spread and consistency. A clinic posting twice a week across four pillars, all four aimed at different stages of awareness, is in a far better position after three months than one posting daily about its own services.

Does a doctor need a big following for video to work?

No. Short video platforms show content to people who do not follow the account, based on the video itself. One video we produced for a client with 84 followers has been watched 251,000 times. A large following helps with trust and repeat viewing, but it is not what decides reach.

Should a doctor show his face in every video?

For medical subjects it helps a great deal, because the face is the credibility. The practical problem is time, and that is usually what ends a clinic's content after two months. There are ways to produce regularly without the doctor filming every piece, but the identity and the words should always be genuinely his.

Is Instagram or YouTube better for a clinic in India?

They do different jobs. Short video on Instagram is the fastest way to reach people who have never heard of you, which is where the sixty are. YouTube holds longer explanations that people find later by searching, which is where the twenty and the seventeen go. Most clinics should start where the discovery happens and let the longer material follow.

Can a doctor legally advertise treatments in videos in India?

Educational content is treated differently from advertising. The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 forbids advertising that claims to cure conditions named in its schedule, and the medical council's ethics regulations restrict soliciting patients. In practice that means explaining a condition is on safer ground than promising a result. The rules have changed more than once in recent years, so it is worth checking the current position rather than relying on what was true two years ago.

This article is about content and publishing, not about treatment. Nothing here is medical advice, and nothing here claims that any treatment cures, prevents or guarantees a result. Anyone with a health concern should speak to a qualified practitioner.

Talk to Akash

Thirty minutes. You leave with a list of what to fix.

This is not a sales call. Akash opens your videos and your page with you, and shows you where people are falling off.

Akash Gupta
Akash GuptaHe takes the call himself
  • He opens your channel live on the call
  • He shows you where people fall off
  • You leave with what to fix, in order

Five quick questions first, so the call starts with your business.

Or just type

WhatsApp
WhatsApp us